Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-04-20-Speech-2-406"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-04-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040420.17.2-406"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-04-20-Speech-2-4072
lpv:speaker	lp:Nielson2
lpv:spoken text	". It is not possible to give a clear answer – it is a long story. There are cases in post-conflict situations where budget support is simply necessary – even if a country is not even discussing being on-track or off-track – simply because if we and other donors did not step in, everything would simply break down. That is one case. It is also a factor that the IMF and the World Bank have changed in recent years; not that we always agree on everything with them, but we are not discussing this in the context of the 1980s or early 1990s. The partnership we now have reflects a more poverty-oriented, more socially-responsible view compared to that held during those times."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Commission"1 "Nielson,"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph