Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-04-19-Speech-1-167"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20040419.13.1-167"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Madam President, cadmium is extremely toxic. In the water framework directive, we, that is the Council, Parliament and Commission, have decided to impose a gradual ban on cadmium. Why do we not do the same here?
The Commission has proposed a closed-loop system, but the rapporteur has already pointed out that only 80% is being recovered, which means that 20% must be disappearing into the environment. The Commission proposal is flawed in another way, namely the extraction of cadmium – a tiny amount of it – from the waste stream, which is huge; that is an extremely inefficient way of working, and so it is better to work on a ban and introduce a few derogations later.
Lithium-ion and nickel-hydride batteries are already on the market. In future, fuel cells will become available too. The alternative is thus in place. What is more, the market share of the alternative is already growing. That is why it is very regrettable that the Commission has succumbed to the pressure from part of the industry. European politics should reward the pioneers in industry and not those lagging behind, as the Commission is doing. Unfortunately, rewarding those lagging behind is exactly what the Christian Democrats and the Commission are doing. I hope that the majority in this House will know better."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples