Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-04-01-Speech-4-166"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20040401.3.4-166"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
Turkey decided in favour of Europe as long ago as the Atatürk revolution in the early 1920s. Moreover, people from Turkey and their descendants have formed a major population group in Western Europe for the past 40 years. This has made the discussion about the question whether Turkey belongs to Europe and whether it would not be preferable if it were to sign association agreements with the Middle East, Central Asia or Iran, increasingly more theoretical.
Those who want to keep Turkey outside the European Union on the grounds that it is largely outside Europe in geographical terms or because it is not founded upon the Judaeo-Christian tradition, lost the argument a long time ago. However, this does not mean that those who defend the other extreme are necessarily right either.
In its current state, Turkey does fit into the authoritarian Europe of the first half of the twentieth century, but not as yet in a European Union of parliamentary democracies. Before that can happen, it will need to stop banning political parties, do away with an electoral system that is geared towards exclusion, stop taking political prisoners, and abolish censorship of the press, the oppression of regional languages and the army's political influence. Legislative amendments without changes in practice are not enough. Anyone who wants Turkey to join for military, economic or idealistic reasons should realise the negative effects that a premature admission could have. It would not benefit democracy, human rights, peace and the environment within the European Union."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples