Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-31-Speech-3-147"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-31"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040331.3.3-147"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-31-Speech-3-1482
lpv:speaker	lp:José Ribeiro E Castro2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; UEN (1999-11-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (2002-02-06--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Popular (1999-11-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". The report refers to a proposal aimed at enabling a Member State to issue a European Evidence Warrant, which may be executed in other Member States. The European Evidence Warrant is, in other words, a judicial order issued in one Member State, for the specific purpose of obtaining documents and data for use in criminal proceedings, which may be executed within other Member States, without its having to be converted into a judicial order in the Member State concerned. In its proposed form, the European Evidence Warrant will make it possible to obtain evidence that is already available in the State of execution. It cannot, however, be used in order to initiate action or to request the performance of investigations in the form of interrogations, hearings, interception of communications, monitoring or surveillance of individuals, and so on. Overall, I welcome the report in as far as it addresses the issue of the European Evidence Warrant. I do not welcome, however, references made to procedural safeguards in Amendments Nos 5 and 7. This report is concerned with the European Evidence Warrant, and, given that this document is not the appropriate place to address the issue of procedural safeguards, I have no choice but to vote against."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph