Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-30-Speech-2-111"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040330.4.2-111"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-30-Speech-2-1122
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Queiró2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Popular (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; PETI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South America and MERCOSUR (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; UEN (2000-09-21--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". The draft Council decision seeks to include, in light of the new division of jurisdiction in direct actions and the enlargement of the EU, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak, Slovene and Czech amongst the working languages established under Article 35 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure. Following on from the new division of jurisdictional powers between the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance set out by the Treaty of Nice, it is also appropriate to establish a rule for deciding on the working language of proceedings in the court, provided that the requesting party is an institution. As for the similar proposal for the ECJ, the rapporteur and the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market consider that the proposal ‘would seem properly founded and is the logical consequence of enlargement of the Union. It can therefore be approved without amendment (explanatory statement)’. Our statement on the new linguistic arrangements in the ECJ holds true on this matter too and we consequently voted in favour."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph