Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-10-Speech-3-101"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20040310.3.3-101"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The Daul report has received the consensus of Alleanza Nazionale, as an acceptable compromise has been reached between the various political groups of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, thanks to the work carried out by Mr Berlato to modify the Commission’s original proposal.
Our objective, with regard to a proposal which would also have endangered the Italian position of oil in certain disadvantaged areas, was an agreement which provides for a flexible 60% partial decoupling of aid, with the States having the opportunity to increase this percentage if necessary.
Together with other groups, the AN supported and obtained the introduction, in addition to landscape and social criteria, of a quality criterion, along with measures such as Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and organic production, hand-harvesting and other measures which do not relate to quantity.
The quality of the product is a guarantee for consumers and protects the specific types of agriculture of certain European States. We are therefore satisfied that the specific Italian characteristics with respect to the production of high quality olive oil are tangibly recognised, and we welcome the support mechanisms for olive growers, which safeguard employment levels in rural areas that are being depopulated and introduce important measures to guarantee quality European oil.
This is why I voted for the Daul report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples