Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-09-Speech-2-078"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EC-Israel association agreement2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040309.5.2-078"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-09-Speech-2-0792
lpv:speaker	lp:Bas Belder2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; EDD (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-09-25--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, south-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 unknown; ChristenUnie - Staatkundig Gereformeerde Parti (2002-03-18--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the United States (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I hope to give an example of Dutch common sense. On 4 September 2003, this House was already debating the proper application of the EC-Israel Association Agreement. On that occasion, I quoted the conclusion of the Dutch Foreign Minister that ‘in the case of most of the products that carry Israeli proof of origin, the Netherlands can assume that the conclusions by Israeli customs regarding their origin have been reached in a lawful manner. This means that they meet all the conditions of the rules of origin protocol’. Last year, I asked the Commission whether it could subscribe to this conclusion from the Hague for the other EU Member States too. No answer came at that time. Perhaps today’s representative of the Commission will be rather more forthcoming. I shall not lose heart, however, and shall ask a second question. Is the demanding of additional customs duties from importers of products presumably originating from Israeli settlements a unilateral policy? What is the Commission’s view on this?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph