Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-02-26-Speech-4-102"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-02-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040226.5.4-102"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-02-26-Speech-4-1032
lpv:speaker	lp:Yves Butel2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine and the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committees and Delegation for relations with Belarus (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 co-chair; EDD (2002-07-03--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Chasse, Pêche, Nature, Traditions (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". Like the majority, the Group for a Europe of Democracies and Diversities deplores the fact that, despite repeated requests, the Commission has not presented a clear, relevant and meaningful account of the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. We approve, however, of calling on the Commission to refrain from interfering in areas that are better dealt with by levels of government closer to citizens. The EDD Group also supports monitoring subsidiarity in a way that involves national parliaments at an early stage in the legislative procedure. In which case, however, the Hunting, Fishing, Nature and Traditions (CPNT) members of the EDD Group cannot accept the idea that the fate of an objection officially brought by the national parliaments against a Commission proposal should be subject to the latter’s willingness to retain, amend or withdraw the text in question. Yet that is the solution recommended by this report, which is based on the protocol annexed to the draft constitution. That draft fell on the delimitation of competences and sought only to increase the Community institutions’ scope for intervention. The Members of this House from the CPNT will oppose this if it should see the light of day, just as they are opposing it today in the context of this report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph