Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-02-25-Speech-3-096"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-02-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Failure to consult Parliament in connection with the TEN Quick Start projects2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040225.6.3-096"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-02-25-Speech-3-0972
lpv:speaker	lp:Josu Ortuondo Larrea2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South America and MERCOSUR (2002-10-09--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Temporary committee on improving safety at sea (2003-11-20--2004-04-21)3 unknown; Partido Nacionalista Vasco (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I certainly agree with promoting a European growth initiative. Nonetheless, I cannot accept the restrictive interpretation of the so-called Quick Start List. A list of priority projects already exists. These were endorsed at the Essen and Dublin European Councils, and the Commission has proposed a second enlargement. I believe all these priority projects should have an equal chance of access to Community aid. The challenge ought to be getting the projects under way at the earliest opportunity, not cutting the number of projects. In my view, one option could be setting up some sort of a bonus system involving an extra payment for projects or parts of projects certified as having been completed over the next three years. That would be far more effective than an cut of the list of projects on the basis of the likelihood of their being launched or completed. Certain sections of high-speed railway line could be largely completed between now and 2006. The Vitoria-Dax line is one of these, yet it does not appear on the Quick Start List. I am also of the opinion that the so-called maritime highways should be deemed cross-border projects on condition that they link ports in two Member States."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"a priori"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph