Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-02-11-Speech-3-300"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20040211.4.3-300"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
As submitted to us, the report contains an enormous number of amendments, among which I have concentrated on only one, namely Amendment No 20, which relates to recital 21.
In fact, my help has been sought by the Architects’ Council of Europe, at the request of the architects and consulting engineers of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
This amendment would introduce the concept of surveyors being able to offer building design services. Introducing a reference to surveyors into this directive would confer recognition on a profession which exists only in the United Kingdom and in Ireland, and whose members are not involved in the designing of buildings. In these countries, ‘building surveyors’ are occasionally employed in the design of buildings. The profession of surveyor not being common in Europe, the versions of the amendment in various languages will introduce confusion as to who is entitled to design buildings. The French translation refers to ‘
’, who are not part of the same profession.
This amendment appears to me to be dangerous, and I will be voting against it."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"géomètres"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples