Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-02-10-Speech-2-205"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-02-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040210.10.2-205"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-02-10-Speech-2-2062
lpv:speaker	lp:Olivier Dupuis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2002-03-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (2001-10-03--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, south-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, strange forces are at work in the management of our questions. In December I asked a question on Croatia. It was held over from the January part-session until this part-session. I thought in good faith that it had been held over because Mr Verheugen was to have been with us at this session and other Members had also asked questions about Croatia’s accession. Nothing of the sort! Furthermore, not only do I find that my question is at the end of the list and not at the beginning, which would have been logical given that it was withdrawn in January, but also I know that it will not be possible to receive an oral answer. And of course I have not been able to ask another question for February. I would like the services to take careful note of this fact and for it to be reflected in the Minutes of this sitting, because I really do not think that this is as it should be. There are some very dubious goings-on surrounding Croatia’s accession process. Some countries are blocking it and I will name them: they are the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. We urgently need a debate to clarify all of this."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph