Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-12-17-Speech-3-067"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20031217.4.3-067"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
". – Mr President, I would like to reiterate that the Commission fully supports the compromise package presented by the two rapporteurs, Mrs Müller and Mrs Grossetête, and accepted by the Groups. But following the debate last night, at the request of honourable Members, I would like to reiterate and clarify the Commission position on the amendments concerning homeopathic medicines.
The Commission agrees with the compromise package in this field too. This means that we cannot accept amendments which introduce either non-defined technical concepts which aim at extending the registration procedure beyond requirements defining this simplified procedure, or which are contrary to the harmonisation sought.
Regarding Compromise Amendment No 20, which the Commission accepts, I would like to point out the following. Originally the amendment tabled asked Member States to take due account of registrations delivered by others. It became evident that the common position had already foreseen in Article 39 the fact that the Community regulation procedure has to be applied to these kinds of products, so the common position has already gone beyond the objective.
Compromise Amendment No 20 clarifies the legal situation establishing that the Community regulation procedure will apply to registered homeopathic medicines and that it should be accepted.
This compromise package would essentially improve the common position accepted by the Council. That is the reason the Commission supports the proposals by Mrs Müller and Mrs Grossetête."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples