Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-12-16-Speech-2-307"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-12-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Measuring instruments2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031216.8.2-307"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-12-16-Speech-2-3082
lpv:speaker	lp:Liikanen2
lpv:spoken text	". Mr President, it was not my intention to hog the debate, but in response to Mr Martin's question I should like to point out that, yes, harmonisation is necessary here. In the light of the famous case law, harmonisation is necessary because national technical regulations conflict and separate conformity assessments are required. The proposal in question based on the new approach replaces some 11 existing old-approach directives which allow for national legislation to exist alongside Community provisions and are technically outdated. Harmonisation thus allows firms to gain from economies of scale and to improve the competitiveness of European firms in the global market."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Commission"1 "Liikanen,"1 "cassis de Dijon"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph