Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-12-04-Speech-4-122"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-12-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031204.6.4-122"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-12-04-Speech-4-1232
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Marinho2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Socialista (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (2002-01-30--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South America and MERCOSUR (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". I voted against in the first case and abstained on the second part of item 9 because: it is not clear whether the Naples Conclave will result in the idea of one Commissioner per Member State. In fact the alternative to what was agreed in the Convention, based on the requirement for one Commissioner per State, will lead to the re-imposition of the requirement for two Commissioners for the more populous States, which not only differentiates between States, whereby the large States count for twice as much as the others, but also favours the creation of concentration of powers into twelve Commissioners from these States to the detriment of the others; the amendment puts forward a false idea of equality, which is in my opinion more likely to be achieved with the rotating equality in which each Member State can choose whether to belong to the College of Commissioners with or without voting rights, on an alternating basis according to the specific composition of the successive Commissions. This gives countries equal opportunities as regards time, with none having more rights than any other."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph