Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-12-04-Speech-4-121"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-12-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031204.6.4-121"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-12-04-Speech-4-1222
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2002-03-06--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Temporary committee on improving safety at sea (2003-11-20--2004-04-21)3 substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". What could be expected from a resolution on the IGC signed by the right, social democrats and Greens? What can be said about a resolution that seeks to impose the unacceptable ‘European constitution’ proposed by the ‘Convention’ on the governments, national parliaments and citizens of the various countries that make up the EU, and which advocates extending qualified majority voting and simplifying procedures that facilitate moving from unanimity to qualified majority decision-making, calling into question the right of ‘small’ countries to defend its interests? What can be said about a resolution that, at the proposal of the Group of the Party of European Socialists, (PSE) – of which the is a member – supports the existence of a European Commission that does not have one Commissioner per country with voting rights, removing the right of ‘small’ countries to be represented in the only institution with legislative initiative and which proposes that it should be possible to amend ‘Part III’ of the so-called ‘Constitution’ through what is being called a ‘light’ procedure, in an attempt to bypass an IGC and the ratification of its conclusions by national parliaments? What can be said about a resolution that, because it supports the idea, fails to mention or condemn the way in which the bases of neoliberal capitalism, militarism and the attack on the sovereignty of States are consolidated as a result of power being centralised in the supranational institutions of the European Union? This is simply unacceptable!"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Partido Socialista"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph