Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-11-20-Speech-4-071"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031120.4.4-071"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-11-20-Speech-4-0722
lpv:speaker	lp:Marie-Arlette Carlotti2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Development and Cooperation (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (2002-02-06--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"We have already pronounced ourselves twice on the draft directive for the liberalisation of port services (cargo-handling, passenger services, pilotage, mooring and towing). Hugely important interests are at stake: economic and financial interests, but above all social and human interests. Since our first vote on this matter, almost three years ago to the day, the French Socialists have fought to safeguard the public-service character of port services. After several amendment battles, we achieved significant progress, particularly in securing the exclusion of pilotage and mooring services from the scope of the directive. Having been unable to achieve the same success on cargo-handling, a service provided by dockers, by the time the second reading came round on 11 March 2003, we voted against a draft that is an integral part of the policy of relentlessly liberalising all modes of transport in Europe. Today, the draft on which we are called to pass judgment, in the form of the joint text resulting from the conciliation procedure between Parliament and the Commission, represents a very distinct regression on all the points we fought to improve. As it stands, this text is unacceptable."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Explanation of vote abbreviated in accordance with Article 137(1) of the Rules of Procedure)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph