Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-11-18-Speech-2-242"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-11-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031118.7.2-242"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-11-18-Speech-2-2432
lpv:speaker	lp:Avril Doyle2
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, on a point of order and by way of follow-up to Mr Newton Dunn's point of order, I have been sitting here listening with great interest to what Mr Nielson has said, but had a specific question to put forward in part three. Since you invite oral questions for Commissioners for parts one, two and three, why is it that after the second half hour we did not revert to the first question of part three? Why is it that those of us with questions one, two and three in part three will not receive oral answers? I find it a discourtesy to colleagues. If our turn is never to be reached, we should be told to put down a written question to the Commissioners. If we can only have answers from the Commissioners who are available on the day – Mr Monti and Mr Nielson in this case – then why invite questions to any Commissioner? Why have a section, under other questions – part three – which should have had half an hour, and then ignore it? I fail to understand this, and with respect find it a discourtesy to colleagues."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2002-03-08--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Fine Gael Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Doyle (PPE-DE )."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph