Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-10-23-Speech-4-112"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20031023.2.4-112"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". The European Parliament’s motion for a resolution attempts to find an even balance between the suggestions and criticisms aimed at the parties to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This objective, however, is not wholly realised. Indeed, some of the main criticisms aimed at the state of Israel are out of place in the economy of the text, since the actions which gave rise to them are not mentioned and the corresponding interventions are ‘justified’. I might mention, by way of an example, the condemnation of Israel following its attack on terrorist bases in Syria, with no direct reference made to the terrorist act which preceded it. The criticism of Israel’s construction of a dividing wall is also poorly supported in historical terms. The Israeli authorities consider that wall to be nothing more than a ‘security fence’. For all these reasons, I did not vote with the majority of the Group of the Party of European Socialists, opting instead to abstain."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph