Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-10-20-Speech-1-010"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-10-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Order of business2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031020.2.1-010"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-10-20-Speech-1-0112
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Cohn-bendit2
lpv:spokenAs	co-chair; G/EFA (2002-01-08--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Les Verts-Europe-Ecologie (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Conference of Presidents (2002-01-08--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-09-02--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I do not think that anyone could suspect our group or me personally of being opposed to a debate on Chechnya. Nevertheless, if we are going to have a debate on Chechnya, I think that it should be on the basis of a resolution. This does not make any sense: everyone is aware of the situation. For our part, we propose that there be a debate on Chechnya, on the basis of a resolution, at the mini part-session, that is to say in a fortnight's time. In any case, if it is topical issues that we are talking about, we ought to have held this debate, and voted on it, at the last mini part-session, whereas now Bolivia actually seems to me to be the most topical issue on which Parliament ought to adopt a position on the basis of a resolution. We do not therefore wish to debate Chechnya without a resolution and propose that we do so at the mini part-session, with a resolution."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph