Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-24-Speech-3-192"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030924.3.3-192"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, Commissioner, Mr President-in-Office of the Council, one minute is not long, but if it is to reiterate what has been said before, then one minute is sufficient. I concur with what Mr Wurtz has said, but I should like to add something in relation to our own mandate. When we are confronted with endless violence that always generates more violence, then we are facing a situation that condemns Europeans, Americans and Russians to powerlessness, insofar as their opinions are expressed in a joint phased plan to peace. There is no phased plan to peace. I have read it and do not want to read it again. For what is left of it? It has been shot to tatters from all corners. What I am asking you is how we can take a new direction. With this roadmap, have we not been led to believe in an all too optimistic scenario, the premises of which have not been accepted by the actual state of Israel itself? Has Israel accepted that it will, from now on, live with a Palestinian state beside it? Has Israel really abandoned the idea that the occupied territories should be governed by Israelis? I am coming to the conclusion that it has not and that, instead, it hopes to achieve military dominance in the region with military backing from the United States. In that case, there will be no peace. Every nation is entitled to its own home. I see it as Europe's responsibility to sit down with both parties to find out their real intentions and to stop collaborating with a regime that is using military means to eradicate part of a powerless nation and is trying to kill its elected president."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples