Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-24-Speech-3-101"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-09-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030924.2.3-101"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-09-24-Speech-3-1022
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexandros Alavanos2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-01-17--2004-04-14)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2002-02-07--2004-04-14)3 unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras kai tis Proodou (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-04-14)3
lpv:translated text	". The report and the amendments by the Committee on Legal Affairs on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions creates an asphyxiating environment for the creative skills of scientists and small software firms and will ultimately only work in favour of the giant enterprises which have thousands of patents and huge legal departments to throttle small companies and, more importantly, the free innovative environment. The European Union will thus follow the path of support for the behemoths taken by the USA. Patents should have nothing to do with algorithms or business methods. This should have been made clear and the only restriction should be on technical/material structures. Despite the improvements made by plenary, the lack of transparency remains, which is why I voted against."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph