Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-23-Speech-2-116"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-09-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030923.4.2-116"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-09-23-Speech-2-1172
lpv:speaker	lp:Dominique Vlasto2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; EPP-ED (2000-01-01--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (2002-12-02--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". I have tabled an amendment calling for the European Commission’s proposal concerning the alignment of measures with regard to security of supply for petroleum products to be rejected. I do not believe that this proposal would provide an appropriate or effective response in the event of an oil crisis. Increasing the level of minimum stocks from 90 to 120 days would be an expensive measure to put in place in many States, due to the current inadequacy of stock infrastructures in the Union. Furthermore, increasing the level of these stocks would not make a difference significant enough to give the Union a greater influence over the oil markets than the producer countries. Lastly, setting up public oil stock bodies would impose substantial costs on the Member States whereas the European Commission would increase its intervention capacity for managing these stocks. Such an approach, which deprives States of their powers in the field of managing energy supply is, therefore, unacceptable. In rejecting this text, we have rejected an idea that wrongly appeared to be a good one, based on solutions that were both simplistic and ineffectual."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph