Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-04-Speech-4-143"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030904.5.4-143"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The report by Mr Fodé Sylla on the fundamental rights situation in the Union, full of extreme proposals, gives an idea of what threatens to happen if the Union were to gain greater competence in this area, which is what the Convention has proposed.
It is enough to list the proposals relating to immigration: expanding the right to asylum, broader legal immigration channels; relaxing naturalisation procedures, expanding the concept of European citizenship to non-EU legal immigrants, granting them the right to vote in local and European elections, and it goes on.
These proposals are accompanied by harsh and peremptory judgments on this or that named European country, which is enjoined to redeem itself by making amends. In addition, France was asked to ratify the Charter on Regional and Minority Languages that the previous socialist government signed. I hope that they will never do it.
We can see that if the Charter on Fundamental Rights were to become obligatory then the Union would have, thanks to this Charter and to Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the right to impose real enforcement of rights, oriented, or rather disoriented – towards destroying our societies."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples