Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-02-Speech-2-280"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-09-02"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030902.10.2-280"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-09-02-Speech-2-2812
lpv:speaker	lp:Wallström2
lpv:spoken text	". The honourable Member has raised a very valid question. How do we communicate Natura 2000 and the creation of this important network, when the original motives have been lost in the debate in the years that followed the introduction of this directive? I hope that we will also be better able to assist Member States in giving good examples of how to communicate the directive, but I am not convinced that we will ever be able to solve this problem of the Finnish Government and authorities having to introduce a consultation process with, for example, Finnish landowners. We will never be able to solve that from Brussels, but hopefully we can do better in giving good examples of how this consultation process can be implemented and carried out in different countries. It is important that we also make clear where the responsibility lies with the Commission and where there is a case for subsidiarity and we will thus have to rely on a Member State – in this case the Finnish Government and authorities – to also organise work on this. From a formal point of view, we have not found any wrongdoings in the Finnish having, for example, arbitrarily carried out this work. We cannot find any such formal mispractice at all."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Commission"1 "Wallström,"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph