Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-02-Speech-2-239"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030902.10.2-239"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Commissioner, the reform of the CAP should be carried out above all
in the countryside, and not just on paper. The people who will have to reform and convert their crops and their farming are the farmers, not just the bureaucrats.
In the countryside there is great uncertainty and worry about the consequences of the reform at the moment. In less-favoured regions, there is much more. This is because, as you know, new commercial policies will be needed, and in less-favoured regions – objective 1 regions, apart from the terminological issue – new commercial measures, education and training for farmers are going to be needed. In this reform, however, you have not planned for anything like this for the regions in the worst situations.
In Andalusia this will mean more than EUR 1 000 million. Throughout this summer there has been talk of a hard blow. Furthermore, your proposal is bureaucratically much more complex. In other words, rather than being simplified, the bureaucracy is increasing. From the point of view of social cohesion, moreover, this represents a retrograde step, especially when Mr Prodi commissions reports from his advisers which may be the final straw for social cohesion.
You are not replying to my question, Commissioner. To what are you referring when you say that it is true that certain areas – the least-favoured – may be subject to reductions? What does this mean? A little more formality, and a lot more with those who are worst ..."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples