Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-07-02-Speech-3-086"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030702.2.3-086"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
The same objections apply even more to this directive than to Mr Zappalà's report on public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, which was discussed at the same time. This time, it is about large and long-term contracts and concerns tasks regarded, for a century or longer, as forming part of the core tasks of the government itself.
It is about products and services that are essential to society as a whole, households and industry, and which, at one time, were intentionally taken away from private companies, which had failed to offer continuity, a quality service, acceptable prices and a reasonable treatment of the consumer. A government monopoly under democratic control was seen as the only acceptable solution that could guarantee the required product and consumer protection. This choice was, at the time, scarcely contentious even among advocates of capitalism. For deliveries and services in these areas, private companies preferred to depend on a reliable government monopoly than on the uncertainty and lack of continuity that characterises the free market.
Meanwhile, governments wishing to reduce taxes and suffering from a lack of funds have sold such companies to internationally operating concerns that wish to make a profit from them. If this is what they choose to do, then it is true that rules are desperately needed. However, it is then wrong to give much consideration to company secrets and other company interests."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples