Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-07-01-Speech-2-249"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-07-01"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Food safety2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030701.8.2-249"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-07-01-Speech-2-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexander de Roo2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; GroenLinks (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Cyprus Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-04-30)3 vice-chair; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-22--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the Group of the Greens can by and large support the Klaβ report. We believe in particular that industry must prove that a substance is non-allergenic. That has fortunately been retained in the compromise. As regards the Olsson report the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance supports the compromise. Just like Mr Olsson we would of course have preferred to ban all growth promoters, but there are in particular animal welfare reasons for making a few limited exceptions nonetheless. We are glad that there will be more research into safety and into efficient alternatives, so that eventually we can move away from them altogether. We have a whole lot more difficulty with the Ayuso González report. The Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance would go much further. Many of these additives and all those substances are unnecessary as far as we are concerned. With the precautionary principle in mind, parabens, polysorbates and aluminium phosphates should be banned immediately. We will however assent to the compromise because it is a step forward compared with the Commission proposal."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph