Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-06-05-Speech-4-125"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-06-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030605.3.4-125"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-06-05-Speech-4-1262
lpv:speaker	lp:Dominique F.C. Souchet2
lpv:spokenAs	member; NA (2001-01-31--2004-07-19)3 member; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (2002-02-06--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Mouvement pour la France (2000-11-23--2004-07-19)3 member; PECH (2002-11-18--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". The principle of decoupling direct aid, whether totally, as the European Commission wishes, or partially, to ‘start with’, as the Cunha report recommends, is a bad one. It will make the CAP even more complex and bureaucratic. We need to completely move away from direct aid to farmers being ‘compensatory’ for drops in prices and income that have been inflicted on them by previous reforms. This disconnects the aid from agriculture and therefore renders it unjustifiable in the eyes of taxpayers. It prevents the COMs, as tools for monitoring and guiding production, from being effective, and weakens Europe’s negotiating position at the WTO. It is true that when the Commission wants to destroy a common policy, it tends to use the strategy of implementing a reform that is so unworkable and unsustainable that it is simply a step towards the complete disappearance of the public policy which it was intended to adapt. The only point that I am satisfied with is the adoption of my amendment on energy and industrial crops on set-aside land, which should enable the emerging sectors to be consolidated."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph