Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-06-05-Speech-4-120"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030605.3.4-120"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
".
The vast majority of reports we have just voted upon I can support and agree with. Jeggle and Souchet often cause me little problems but Mr Cunha's report is different.
The current CAP, which has been reformed on many different occasions down the years, has become top-heavy with red tape and bureaucracy, and I rather feel that what we are proposing is to heap more misery on top of what already exists. What do we have now? De-coupling, modulation, degressivity and cross-compliance in place of good farming practice and an honest return for honest endeavours. I sincerely believe that partial de-coupling will prove to be the worst of all worlds and provide no encouragement for the industry in the future, or do anything to streamline the industry or encourage young people to make a career in agriculture.
This will immediately mean more controls and inspections and less time for the farmer to tend his stock. I will vote against to ensure that in the longer term the Northern Ireland agriculture industry is not destroyed in the name of efficiency."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples