Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-06-04-Speech-3-237"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20030604.7.3-237"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"The Council’s response is of some interest in that it is rather hard to understand the criteria the Council uses to judge whether or not an organisation should or should not be deemed a terrorist organisation. I think that the rules of due process, of fair legal proceedings, should at least allow the various organisations to have the right to resort to the courts. Parliament is entitled to be informed of the dossier the Council used to make its decision. Mr President-in-Office of the Council, I therefore have some very specific questions for you. Would the Council be willing to supply the European Parliament with the documents detailing the charges levelled against all the groups you consider to be terrorist organisations? Would you also be prepared to define the criteria you applied in establishing whether or not the group was a terrorist organisation? As we are aware, Russia has just requested that three Chechen groups be added to the list of terrorist organisations, although two of these groups are in fact completely non-existent. This is a particularly interesting case, incidentally."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph