Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-06-04-Speech-3-063"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030604.3.3-063"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I would ask, for a quite specific reason, to take the floor under the rules of procedure. I shall not, like Mr Rothley, talk in very elevated terms, but explain to him that the reason why the Group of the Party of European Socialists wishes to omit paragraph 5 of the resolution is simply that the Praesidium has already made a decision. At the same time, however, there are some important principles contained in this demand that changes to the reimbursement of travel costs enter into force at the same time as the new Statute, if it ever sees the light of day.
There is one particular point, however, that ought to be clarified, and I should therefore like to table an oral amendment to paragraph 5. Instead of calling upon the Praesidium to take a decision, the wording might be in terms of taking note of the Praesidium’s decision. At the same time, an important addition should be made: namely, where the words ‘enter into force together with the Statute’ appear, I wish to propose adding the words ‘and with the same validity as the latter’.
It may perhaps be a little difficult to grasp in translation, but the principle is that decisions taken on the reimbursement of travel costs must have the same legal validity as the Statute. That is what I should like to propose."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples