Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-05-13-Speech-2-122"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030513.5.2-122"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
This report comes at a crucial, not to say extremely difficult time in the history of the ACP/EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly: the result of the session planned for November 2002, in Brussels, being cancelled due to disagreements between the ACP and EP Members on what to do about the delegates sent by the Zimbabwean Government, despite the entry ban imposed on them. The text that was ultimately adopted in committee prefers to emphasise that part of this crisis falls outside the competence of the APP (and specifically concerns the coherence and the hierarchy of the decisions taken by the Council and the European Parliament), and welcomes the normalisation of relations between the two parties, illustrated by the fact that that the March session took place in Brazzaville in favourable circumstances and by the positive outcome that was achieved. I agree with this interpretation and therefore intended to vote in favour of the report. The fact that plenary rejected the proposals for amendments tabled by the UEN Group, however, which sought to correct a serious injustice and discrimination in the composition and operation of permanent bodies of the APP led me to abstain from the final vote."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples