Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-04-10-Speech-4-105"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-04-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030410.4.4-105"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-04-10-Speech-4-1062
lpv:speaker	lp:Georges Berthu2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; ECON (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (2001-01-31--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Mouvement pour la France (2000-11-23--2004-07-19)3 member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". The Morillon report proposes a new, unitarian, centralised European security and defence architecture, which seems to be both unrealistic and outdated. In fact, the report is entirely consistent with the Community framework. It pays no attention to what should be the main principle, the free participation of countries and variable geometry of associations. There is only one reference to ‘constructive abstention’, the slight flexibility introduced by the Treaty of Amsterdam to preserve the general centralised framework. On the other hand, however, great emphasis is placed on the need to develop the competences of the existing European institutions and the inclusion of costs in the Community budget (Paragraphs 40, 56 and 57 of the resolution). The Iraq crisis has shown the extent to which this organisation was outdated. In any case, however, this report is not realistic, as it asserts both the competence of the national parliaments with regard to the use of national forces and that of the European Parliament in relation to approving operations. All that is contradictory. We have to choose. The only possible solution is for the nations to have greater authority and for their parliaments to bear the main responsibility. All the rest should follow on from that."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph