Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-04-08-Speech-2-257"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-04-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030408.6.2-257"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-04-08-Speech-2-2582
lpv:speaker	lp:Vitorino.2
lpv:translated text	". Gladly, Mr Krivine. First of all, a joint flight is a flight that has been organised by at least two Member States. It is at this level that the intention is a joint one, in this case the intention of France and Germany. These two countries assembled a certain number of people in one place who were to be deported and they left on the same flight. It is a joint flight from an organisational point of view. As regards collective expulsion, which is prohibited by the European Convention on Human Rights, the question is: when does collective expulsion arise? A collective deportation order is not made for each of the individuals that make up the group; there is just one order that applies to a whole group of people and that does not take account of the specific situation of each of the individuals in the group. That is the difference. Collective expulsion is prohibited. It is not permitted in the European Union in any shape or form. On the other hand, if you have ten individual deportation orders and if you see these ten people together, there is no doubt that they form a group, but, whether they go on a joint flight or not, it is not a collective expulsion. That is the essential difference in my opinion."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph