Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-03-27-Speech-4-105"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030327.3.4-105"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"The Council has the power to make a different proposal from the one the Commission and Parliament had in mind after Parliament has agreed to it at second reading. It is a clever idea, therefore, to accept an amended proposal but not the legislative resolution at this stage. I am in any case unhappy with the proposals for four reasons. The first reason is that people with practical experience but without the required training are ruled out of these jobs from the outset. Secondly, the number of officials is reduced, and the number of work contracts with a worse legal position may increase to two thirds of the workforce. Thirdly, there is still no satisfactory arrangement for the protection of whistle-blowers, who want to bring malpractices within the organisation out into the open. Fourthly, even the pension problems remain unsolved. It is a bad thing that accusations of sexual harassment could potentially lead to punishment for those whose accusations come to nothing. A good thing is that, from now on, employees only need to announce their publications, without first requesting permission. Voting in the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market took place so late that only one day remained for the tabling of amendments before the plenary session. This does not look like serious decision-making to me."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples