Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-03-13-Speech-4-095"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030313.3.4-095"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
We voted for the Bösch report on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests because it is a serious, solid report which lists astonishing problems and cases of fraud within the Commission, thereby confirming what we have been saying for a long time.
During this sitting, it has been revealed that documents were concealed from the European Parliament in the Andreasen case (contested dismissal of a chief accountant of the Commission, who denounced irregular practice in relation to normal accounting procedures). We would like to protest against this concealment. It is therefore possible that this scandal might become more serious and add to the charges of the Bösch report.
We have reservations, however, with regard to repeating the longstanding demand – which is, in fact, discreet in the Bösch report – for the creation of a European public prosecutor. Without entering into the debate here, I would simply like to point out that the Convention task force concerned, despite its federalist good will, also found this proposal to be debatable. We can be just as effective using other means, such as Eurojust, which would have the merit of not creating a chain of institutional problems
."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples