Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-03-12-Speech-3-244"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030312.6.3-244"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-03-12-Speech-3-2452
lpv:speaker	lp:Piia-Noora Kauppi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; ECON (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the question of the European Union’s borders is very interesting and has also been discussed by the European Convention. Yesterday the Commission adopted a strategy for a good neighbourly relations policy which also lists those countries covered by the policy. Is any significance to be attached to this strategic proposal by the Commission given that we are discussing the possible decision at the Thessaloniki Summit to open negotiations with the new candidate countries? In other words I am asking what the relation is between this strategy for a good neighbourly relations policy and the new, possibly to be called candidate, countries? Is the purpose of the neighbourly relations policy to specify which regions and states can never join the Union, or, in other words, is this in fact a matter of defining the Union’s borders?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph