Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-03-11-Speech-2-101"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030311.5.2-101"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
My vote is intended above all to highlight three points that I believe are crucial: firstly, what is known as ‘self-handling’, must not be surreptitiously subverted, opening the door to all types of opportunism and market distortion. Instead, it should properly be restricted to the ship’s own crew and undertaken in conjunction with the competent port operator; secondly, the system of pilotage in ports must be kept outside the scope of the directive and reserved for national legislation; thirdly, it is crucial that the way is opened for clear rules on State aid in this field to be properly defined, as suggested during the debates on the Green Paper and on which, regrettably, the text of the directive still says very little. Lastly, where the directive makes significant economic amendments to the port operating system, I believe it is also crucial to provide for transitional systems that protect the rightful interests of those operators who have nevertheless accepted ongoing obligations imposed by national legislation and whose economic balance could suffer irremediably."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples