Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-02-12-Speech-3-144"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-02-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030212.4.3-144"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-02-12-Speech-3-1452
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexandros Alavanos2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-01-17--2004-04-14)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2002-02-07--2004-04-14)3,3 unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras kai tis Proodou (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3,3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-04-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	". The prospects and expectations of Lisbon are, unfortunately, a far cry from the situation on the ground in Europe. Europe has not only failed to take the lead in the most important technologies; it is still as far behind the USA as it was before, growth has slowed, unemployment has risen, new sciences are finding it hard to break into the market and regional disparities persist. Unfortunately, the summit Council does not appear to have a cohesive programme or proposals and the proposals by the leaders of France, Germany and Great Britain are confined to the industrial sector. The Spring Summit will need to set out new priorities, tailored to the current climate of economic recession and international tension, which include relaxing the Stability Pact criteria, tax incentives to boost labour intensive activities, special incentives to help regions lagging behind in the new technologies, joined-up interventions to upgrade the education system and monitoring the implementation of Europe objectives in each Member State."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph