Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-01-29-Speech-3-069"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030129.2.3-069"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"The European Parliament must speak out clearly against war as a means of disarming Iraq, because the vast majority of our citizens is against it. The UN has shown the way: by forcing disarmament through inspections and demanding answers to the inspectors’ questions. All further action must take place within the framework of the UN.
Human rights remain a dead letter in other countries as well; other countries also have weapons of mass destruction – Iran, Pakistan, North Korea and India for example.
It is inconceivable that a superpower would be able to unilaterally solve the problem by military means. The fact that Iraq has been weakened by the Gulf War ten years ago and has oil wells does not justify making an exception to this.
There are many other problems waiting to be resolved, such as the Palestine issue, the Middle East, Kashmir and so on.
It is not only the Kurds in Iraq who are waiting for recognition of their rights as a people, but also those in Syria, Turkey and Iran. The pressure on Saddam must be maintained until the regime falls or conforms with the international rule of law. Arming a dictator, as the Russians and the Americans but also the British, French and Germans did with Saddam during his war with Iran, is costly in the long term.
The road to a durable peace must be coupled with disarmament and development. The oil in Iraq changes nothing."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples