Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-01-14-Speech-2-235"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-01-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030114.6.2-235"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-01-14-Speech-2-2362
lpv:speaker	lp:Olivier Dupuis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2002-03-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (2001-10-03--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, south-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Commissioner, thank you for that response, which opens up a number of prospects. I plan to read the written version with great care when it reaches me. You did not respond specifically to the question of the difference in figures between the cost of an initiative such as Voice of America, which costs USD 130 million, and that of another extremely effective radio station, Radio Free Asia, which is recognised as such by numerous inhabitants of Asia, and which only costs USD 30 million annually. Thirty million is starting to look more feasible in relation to the 100 million that make up the annual budget devoted to human rights. My question, however, is, more specifically, the following: if Parliament were to vote for a significant increase in the ‘human rights’ budget heading, would you be inclined to move on to an operational phase of the ‘Voice of Europe’ project?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph