Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-12-17-Speech-2-256"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-12-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20021217.7.2-256"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-12-17-Speech-2-2572
lpv:speaker	lp:Kathleen Van Brempt2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-02-05--2003-09-28)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2003-09-28)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2003-09-28)3 unknown; Socialistische Partij (2000-01-13--2003-09-28)3 member; PES (2000-01-13--2003-09-28)3
lpv:translated text	"As I also say in my question, I do not wish to dispute in any way that civil servants should be allowed to move on to new employment, including the private sector. But your reply does not entirely satisfy me, Commissioner. I want to believe in the good faith – I certainly do believe in your own good faith, let that be clear – of this civil servant. But an impression has been created. He was working on the anti-trust investigation into Microsoft and he leaves to join that company. I think it should be made explicit what case is involved here. I should certainly like to ask in future for a far clearer and more enforceable framework of agreements. Yes, a change of jobs must be possible, but not to companies or sectors on which you yourself have worked for the Commission because this will create the appearance of partiality that damages your Commission and by extension all European institutions. I should like once again to press the Commissioner on his future intentions. Is it feasible to create such a framework of agreements?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph