Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-12-17-Speech-2-119"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20021217.3.2-119"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
The final report is to be welcomed because it upholds the current restrictive list of products. It is also to be welcomed that it insists on the immediate removal of all products falsely labelled ‘Not Irradiated’ when this claim has been disproved by the appropriate tests. It should be remembered that the precautionary principle must always be observed.
The issue is that any technology needs to prove the benefits of its use and take account of the potential risks to health and to the environment, given that food-irradiation technology is highly problematic. In fact, on the basis of a civilian use of nuclear energy, this appears to have no other use apart from replacing the normal hygiene and safety rules that processed foods should already follow. There also appear to be no benefits to consumers because, apart from the risks of improper use, with the possibility of poisoning, irradiation makes it more difficult for the consumer to discern the true state of the product.
Consequently, the overriding aim of this technology appears to be something else – speeding up the liberalisation of international trade and increasing the centralisation/concentration of the mass production and distribution of foods throughout the world, with consequences for the delocalisation of agri-food production and for the decline of small-scale local farmers, thereby calling sustainable development into question."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples