Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-11-20-Speech-3-353"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Working conditions for temporary workers2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20021120.11.3-353"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-11-20-Speech-3-3542
lpv:speaker	lp:Manuel Pérez Álvarez2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Popular (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-04-25--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to congratulate the Commissioner on the presentation of this document, as well as Mrs van den Burg on the efforts she has made to find a balance, and I am going to comment very briefly on three specific points. Firstly, the purpose of temporary work agencies, as an instrument for flexibility in the labour market, which reconcile the aspirations of workers with the needs of companies. I believe they are going to provide greater possibilities and opportunities for employment, for accessing the labour market. Secondly, I would like to comment on the restrictions and prohibitions relating to the use of the temporary provision of workers and, from a doctrinal or theoretical point of view, I would like to say that, where there is permission for contracting workers on a temporary basis, there is no reason to prohibit the contracting of workers provided by agencies. It must only be objective and duly justified – and therefore restrictive – criteria that regulate prohibitions. Thirdly, I would like to stress the need for particularly intense action on the health and safety protection of workers during work and on the health and safety of workers provided by temporary employment agencies. There are various reasons for this: firstly, the temporary nature of the employment itself, which seems to increase risk; secondly, the diversity of the work to be carried out in the different contracting companies; and, perhaps, thirdly, the differing methods and procedures, even for a task or post of an identical nature in different companies. I believe we should seek different arguments – for example, the voluntary requirement for non-discrimination – which could make a reference to health at work possible, as well as conditions in general and pay, in particular, without regulating them, but making this reference on the basis of support for the principle of non-discrimination."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph