Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-23-Speech-3-231"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20021023.5.3-231"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-10-23-Speech-3-2322
lpv:speaker	lp:Carlos Carnero González2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Socialista Obrero Español (2001-09-13--2004-07-19)3 member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-30--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Malta Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-04-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Mr Haarder, by way of an introduction to my question I shall say that I do not agree with the Council’s decision. I would like the Council to specify the following points: first of all, what is the legal status of the Council’s decision? How would you define it? Secondly, depending on its legal status, does it form part of the Community acquis or not? If it forms part of the Community acquis, the Member States and the candidate countries are obliged to observe it and, therefore, clearly cannot ratify bilateral agreements with the United States that run counter to any Council decision. Lastly, how does the Council think it can control the decisions of the Member States such as, for example, those that could be taken by means of any real bilateral agreements with the United States through amendments to other existing agreements with the US?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph