Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-23-Speech-3-102"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20021023.2.3-102"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spoken text |
". – On behalf of the British Labour Delegation, I would like to explain that with regard to the proposals in the Grossetête report concerning veterinary medicines, we believe that the Commission should accept the current practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. This allows registered personnel to administer a range of animal medicines without a veterinary prescription in cases where veterinary involvement is not considered necessary for safe and effective use. This has worked effectively for many years and has not led to any safety concerns in relation to consumers or users of such medicines.
We also believe that the re-validation of all such medicines should be set at five-yearly intervals, rather than given indefinite authorisation. We do not support the Commission's view that all new active substances for veterinary medicinal products should be authorised under the centralised procedure. This would significantly impact on the development of new products for localised species/conditions and would exacerbate problems of availability of such medicines. Flexibility must therefore be maintained."@en1
|
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples