Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-22-Speech-2-215"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20021022.7.2-215"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
". – The extension of the additional salmonella guarantees to cover mincemeat was not proposed by the Commission. The reason why the additional guarantees should not cover meat preparations, the existence of the salmonella criterion, applies also to mincemeat. However, it has to be noted that it is probably easier to control salmonella in meat preparations than in mincemeat. Therefore the salmonella criteria are more effective for meat preparations than for mincemeat and this can be used to justify the application of additional guarantees to mincemeat and not to meat preparations.
I am sure that Mrs Paulsen is aware of the legislation that is going through the Council at the moment which was discussed at the last meeting of the Agriculture Council. It ran into the buffers to some extent and now has been put back for discussion at the next Agriculture Council. This issue will be discussed on that occasion.
Meat preparations in general are being looked at, but not just for Sweden and Finland. We want to improve standards for the EU as a whole and that is reflected in this legislation, which I hope will get through the Agriculture Council in December."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples