Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-22-Speech-2-072"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20021022.5.2-072"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
The Fiori Report has not received my support. I have abstained for two reasons.
First of all, it is unwise to reduce the excise duty on biofuels before we have a complete picture of the environmental impact of the introduction of these fuels on road transportation. Moreover, several statements have been made about tax policy, an outstanding example of a policy that should take shape close to the people, that is to say in the Member States. A European initiative can only be justified in the event of demonstrable harmful competitive distortion.
Secondly, I object to LPG being classified as an alternative fuel. It is, after all, a petroleum product. Although fewer polluting substances are released as a whole during combustion, there is no doubt that harmful substances are emitted. An alternative fuel is fundamentally different from the so-called traditional fuels because it is both a renewable and emission-free source of energy. As such, LPG certainly cannot be labelled an alternative fuel.
In conclusion, these two elements have prevented me from supporting the report. I certainly welcome a shift to fuels that are less environmentally harmful, but not in the way proposed in the report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples