Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-22-Speech-2-072"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20021022.5.2-072"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". The Fiori Report has not received my support. I have abstained for two reasons. First of all, it is unwise to reduce the excise duty on biofuels before we have a complete picture of the environmental impact of the introduction of these fuels on road transportation. Moreover, several statements have been made about tax policy, an outstanding example of a policy that should take shape close to the people, that is to say in the Member States. A European initiative can only be justified in the event of demonstrable harmful competitive distortion. Secondly, I object to LPG being classified as an alternative fuel. It is, after all, a petroleum product. Although fewer polluting substances are released as a whole during combustion, there is no doubt that harmful substances are emitted. An alternative fuel is fundamentally different from the so-called traditional fuels because it is both a renewable and emission-free source of energy. As such, LPG certainly cannot be labelled an alternative fuel. In conclusion, these two elements have prevented me from supporting the report. I certainly welcome a shift to fuels that are less environmentally harmful, but not in the way proposed in the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph