Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-09-04-Speech-3-206"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-09-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020904.6.3-206"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-09-04-Speech-3-2072
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 10 by Jonas Sjöstedt, which has been taken over by Herman Schmid. Question No 10 by Jonas Sjöstedt (): It is possible that the Irish electorate will vote against the Treaty of Nice for a second time, which would also render the new breakdown of votes on the Council and seats in Parliament under that Treaty null and void. Would it not then be possible for the Union to act as it did at the time of the accession of Finland, Sweden and Austria, i.e. negotiate and reach agreement with each of the applicant countries separately on seats in Parliament and votes in the Council in the treaty of accession? The Treaty of Nice would not then be needed as a basis for the accession of new Member States. Is this not an appropriate procedure to use for the enlargement of the Union should the Irish people vote against the Treaty of Nice once again?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Future accession treaties for new Member States"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph