Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-09-03-Speech-2-200"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020903.8.2-200"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Question No 38 by Bart Staes ():
In early June, Commissioner Bolkestein presented a proposal for a directive designed to refine the four existing directives relating to motor-vehicle insurance. As a result of the previous directives, and in response to repeated calls from the Commissioner with special responsibility for the internal market, what is known as the ‘bonus-malus’ system was abolished in Belgium. That also spelt the end of the agreements on premiums concluded among the various Belgian insurers. The possibility of being able freely to determine premiums undoubtedly constitutes good news for good drivers. On the other hand, this will also increase rather than decrease the serious tensions caused by fragmentation. The result thereof is the likelihood that we shall find more and more uninsured vehicles on our roads.
Will the Commission take into account that adverse effect during the further stages in the drafting of this proposal for a directive, or will it conversely authorise the Member States to take whatever steps they deem necessary to prevent any undesirable effects on premiums caused by fragmentation?"@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Subject: Refinement of the rules governing motor-vehicle insurance in the internal market"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples